IELTS Speaking 12: Giving Opinions on Abstract/Society Questions — Sample Answers

Speaking 3-qism: Chuqur muhokama (Part 3 — Discussion) Lesson 3 of 3
Lessons in this topic · 3/3
  1. IELTS Speaking 10: Part 3 Format — Extending Answers With Reasons and Examples
  2. IELTS Speaking 11: Comparing Past and Present — Sample Answers
  3. IELTS Speaking 12: Giving Opinions on Abstract/Society Questions — Sample Answers

Mavhum va ijtimoiy savollar

Part 3'ning eng qiyin savollari mavhum yoki taxminiy bo'ladi: "Should governments ...?", "What are the benefits of ...?", "Will X change in the future?". Bunda ikki mahorat kerak: fikrni yumshatish (hedging) va taxmin qilish (speculation) — mutlaq emas, ehtiyotkor va o'ylangan javob.

Hedging va speculation tili

Yumshatish (hedging): it depends, to some extent, arguably, I suppose, on the whole, generally speaking

Taxmin (speculation): it might/could ..., it's likely to ..., I suspect ...

Shart gap: "If governments invested more, fewer people would ..."

📌 Nega yumshatish? Mavhum savollarga mutlaq javob ("Yes, always") ko'pincha soddaroq eshitiladi. "It depends... on the whole, I'd argue..." kabi ehtiyotkor, nozik javob band 7+ ni ko'rsatadi va grammatik xilma-xillik (shart gaplar, modal fe'llar) beradi.

🎧 Model javob. Yumshatish (it depends, on the whole, I suspect) + taxmin (could, might) + shart gap (if... would).

🗣️ Shadowing: model javob ortidan bir xil ohang bilan takrorlang — 3 kun × 3 marta. Keyin savolga o'z javobingizni yozib, model bilan solishtiring.
📜 Skript va tarjima — bosing

Examiner: Do you think governments should invest more in public transport?
Hukumatlar jamoat transportiga ko'proq sarmoya kiritishi kerak deb o'ylaysizmi?

Candidate: Well, it depends to some extent on the country, but on the whole, yes, I'd argue they should... the benefits would outweigh the costs, particularly in large cities where congestion is already a serious problem.
Xo'sh, bu ma'lum darajada mamlakatga bog'liq, lekin umuman olganda, ha, kiritishi kerak deb aytaman. Agar hukumatlar ishonchli avtobus va poyezdlarga ko'proq sarmoya kiritsa, kamroq odam mashina haydashga ehtiyoj sezardi, bu esa ham tirbandlik, ham ifloslanishni sezilarli kamaytirishi mumkin. Albatta, bu oddiy yechim emas, chunki yaxshi transport tarmog'ini qurish qimmat va yillar talab qiladi, shuning uchun u hamma joyda ham real bo'lmasligi mumkin. Lekin uzoq muddatda foydalar xarajatlardan ustun bo'ladi deb gumon qilaman, ayniqsa tirbandlik allaqachon jiddiy muammo bo'lgan yirik shaharlarda.

Amaliyot 1. Mavhum savolga ("Should governments...?") nega mutlaq "Yes, always" o'rniga yumshatilgan javob yaxshiroq?

Amaliyot 2. Kelajak yoki taxmin haqidagi savolga qaysi til mos?

Kalit iboralar — Hedging & speculation

it depends (on) ...
bu ... ga bog'liq
on the whole
umuman olganda
arguably
ehtimol, bahslashsa bo'ladiki
it's likely to ...
... ehtimoli katta
I suspect (that) ...
... deb gumon qilaman
in the long run
uzoq muddatda
the benefits would outweigh the costs
foydalar xarajatlardan ustun bo'lardi
generally speaking
umuman aytganda

Xulosa

  • Mavhum/ijtimoiy savollar: yumshatish (hedging) + taxmin (speculation).
  • Hedging: it depends, to some extent, on the whole, arguably.
  • Speculation: might/could, is likely to, if... would (shart gap).
  • Mutlaq javobdan ("always") ko'ra ehtiyotkor, muvozanatli javob band 7+.
Log in to track your progress
Previous IELTS Speaking 11: Comparing Past and Present — Sample Answers
Finish Back to all topics
3-qism: Chuqur muhokama (Part 3 — Discussion)
  1. IELTS Speaking 10: Part 3 Format — Extending Answers With Reasons and Examples
  2. IELTS Speaking 11: Comparing Past and Present — Sample Answers
  3. IELTS Speaking 12: Giving Opinions on Abstract/Society Questions — Sample Answers